Washington, D.C. U.S.A.

(Brief description of the Program)

Background. This is EIGHT-FACTOR MODEL that majority of experts use to present how the economy works and sometimes found inadecuate coprporate operation. The depression of the 1930s and the “stagflation” of the 1970s both forced rethinking. The recent financial crisis has sparked another. The crisis showed that the standard macroeconomic and risk assessment models used by major bankers and investment companies neither represent the financial system accurately nor allow for the booms and busts observed in the real world (as discussed in Economist, Jan. 2013). Open demo version

RISK ASSESSMENT is the first step to the Risk Management  and further repeated on each level of business development. This problem is an “industry-standard” model for sophisticated “agent-based modeling”. It is not solely designed for risk management, but parts of the functionality walk the developer through quality assessment of posterior probabilities for dome events to occur and suggest management approaches to controlling the financed business venture. This parts of the software package allow users, such as groups of experts, to pay with financial risk factors of the business that incorporate various types of capital investors (strategic investor, angel investor, venture capitalist).

The investor must first decide whether to invest in a project in an early design stage. If YES then to manage the risk as mitigating some selected factors, and finally to advise the executive management staff how to operate in order to reduce, or escape, the potential loss and to reach or exceed planned performance.

You should have a solid business plan

It can be very difficult to measure permanently all the time the business environment around because risk with a large potential loss and a low probability of occurring is often treated differently from one with a low potential loss and a high likelihood of occurring. In theory and the proposed treatment, both are of nearly equal priority.

The software, we developed and hereby represent, is a Metalogic master matrix used during the QUANTITATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT to define various levels of risk factors, actual and of the harm probability and harm severity categories for the the business. This is a mechanism, transformed in simple and user friendly for operation Excel-based model for operation with permanent support by the data srore in our server. It increases the visibility of risks and assists the management decision making.

The system, which we practice and have been updating for a long time, consists of this independent Quantitative Risk Assessment • OPEN-SOURCE COMPUTER PROGRAM • (the Program) which is part of the complex Online Cash-Flow Control System (OCFCS).  

The operators are selected eight risk factors, variable as the case so requires, in two polar coordinate systems. The Program treats two components of each risk Factor (F): the magnitude of the potential loss (Assessment Scoring) (S) and the possible impact and probability that the loss will occur (Ratio) (R). These are the two fields in the “matrix of states” wherein the assessor makes (S) and from time to time to select different (R) for some (F). The Program computes the each relative impact and the total level of risk. That’s all you have to do.

 8F: Capital Risk (a often practice version)

Auditors

The Program allows the investor to assign risk assessment to up to four groups of auditors.

Group A. For audits performed by an outside financial advisor (as we are), risk asses-sment is a very crucial stage before accepting an audit engagement. According to ISA 315 "the auditor should perform risk assessment procedures to obtain an understanding of the entity and its environment, including its internal control." Then, we have to be assigned to make a Feasibility Study of the project (together with the Project Company) and implement the complex OCFCS (Recommended).

Group B. Risk assessments performed by internal auditors are entirely different. They are usually designed to facilitate the annual audit plan. Using various elements, coupled with the knowledge and experience of management regarding the particular area, each auditor determines which areas have more risk and should be a priority within the audit plan, the respective value of the R and S of the matrix. So the Client must view the DWMO version of the program and it is recommended to purchase it (at certain stage of development).

Group C. Prior probability idependent expertise of the assessment(s) is also reco-mmended in various cases e.g. when the investor is “angel” type or venture capitalist.

Group D. Posterior probability independent expertise (also called “what if” expertise) provides means of computing the risk of two (or more) posterior mutually exclusive events of interest that can possibly occur in each one F—specifically answers the question what happen if posteriorly some events cause the S of a F suddenly to jump up? This compuration utilizes Bayes’s theorem, extensively used in deceision analyses.

The following block diagram shows probability revision using Buyes theorem.

The software can compute the probabilities level of risk which totals the Group’s assess-ment and averages with the final result of quantitative assessment of all Groups of assessors. The result of this service exceeds all expectations, and surpasses models used by the so called major bankers and the investment companies.

Easy for Operation

Each auditor from a Group of experts enters his assessments in the main matrix. The Program computes the final specific subtotals and average level of risk, creates charts to illustrate and compare data, compares with average data collected in the server from users of similar business, our clients over the world, etc. This model was successfully applied when the investor will develop its production in different countries. Typical examples are chain stores (i) grocery and household goods, (ii) motor oils, (iii) gas stations, etc., with the intention to produce and / or packages part of the goods in local countries.

Conclusion

In the modern world investment decisions in any business (development of manufacturing, sports, etc.), solely based on personal experience, intuition, or insights from the cosmos are equal to an absurd. They must be easy to use, accessable, computer models and expertise.

Printable version.

    More about the theory of Formal System

DOCX-form of Questionnarie (for online fill in)

Power Point presentation (general idea)

Presented by: Prof. George Angelow
Cybernetics eng., economist, PhD of Mats
President of IIC-Group